LEGAL CASES Sample

• Shaughnessy Borowski & Gagner - CTI Inc. v. Software Artesians: expert witness for latter in a case of intellectual property complaint. Won in court on judge's explicit decision to believe us rather the opposing expert.
  
  
• Pettit and Martin - Hewlett Packard v. GTE government systems: expert witness for GTE in a case of a government contract award. Army decided to reconsider.
  
  
• Cohen and White - Sun Microsystems v. Harris: expert witness for Harris in a case of evaluation performance of a large system. Lost on judge's decision of no ground for claim.
  
  
• Steptoe and Johnson - CACI v. Pentagen: expert witness for CACI, Pentagen claim that their process was stolen by CACI. showed that Pentagen has no case, won in summary judgment.
  
  
• Piper and Marbury - Sun Microsystems v. Digital: expert witness for Digital in a case of a government contract award, lost on judge's decision to support Sun Microsystems. Case decided before expert testimony given.
  
  
• Shaughnessy Borowski & Gagner - Bulk Mailing v. Frederic Mailing: expert for latter. Showed early that there is no ground for Bulk lawsuit, latter gave up with expenses.
  
  
• Ober Kaler Grimes & Shriver - Litton v. Tiburon: expert witness for the latter in a case of a large scheme claim where Litton attributed all Tiburon's product to knowledge and design of PRC (bought out by Litton) products. Case lasted more than 8 months. Howrey & Simon decided to settle for very little the night before trial. Since Litton is an industry giant and Tiburon a small company, It was considered a great win for Tiburn and a great win over Howrey & Simon - a major law firm in Washington.
  
  
• LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae (A British Law Firm): A British registering company v. Pentagen technologies International. Expert witness for the registering company. Settled based on our reports.


• Paleos and Krieger - Commonwealth of Virginia v. Jon Honhart: the latter indicted for breaking into the network of The Signature Group.
  
  
• Morgan, Lewis and Buckius - Mitsibushi Heavy Industries (Japan) against Ansaldo (Italy): Evaluated, reported and testified on the software regulating power stations. More than a year after the hearing only the software issue was resolved and in our side’s favor.
  
  
• Falke & Dunphy (Ohio) and Kenneth Lazarus (Washington, DC) - Americom v. Dayton Data Processing: working for Americom. Preliminary work shows strong evidence of stolen software.
  
  
• Wiley Rein & Fielding, DataDirect technologies v. I-Net Software GMBH (Germany): settled after initial analysis, work indicated likelihood of I-Net software has been copied. Case settled out of court.
  
  
• McKenna, Aldridge & Long: GSA protest of a contract award: Evaluated Lockheed Martin’s proposal, the EDS winning proposal as well as the government decision documents. Found major flaws in government decision process and knowledge of technology. Protest was accepted.
  
  
• Sughrue Mion, McQuire Woods, Eaton v. ZF-Meritor (Germany): ITC patent case involves automatic transmissions for large trucks and buses. Evaluated, charted and testified on the patent claims raised by Eaton. Served as software expert only. (Truck issues dealt by a different expert.) ZF-Monitor won on 2 out of 3 of Eaton's patent infringement claim.
  
  
• Sughrue Mion, Eaton v. ZF-Meritor (Germany) In appeal: ZF-Meritor appealed the infringement claim they lost. Again, served as software expert. Pending.