|
|
Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management Crisis and Emergency Management Newsletter Website |
|
| |
March
2008
Volume
14
- Number 2 |
|
British claim to increased natural disasters By Brenda Madrigal In 2004, the
Association for British Insures wrote a report
acknowledging the increase of natural disasters due to the onset of
climate
change. Purpose of the report was to address impact of natural
disasters on the
industry. Although the particulars for climate change remain disputed,
the
insurance industry identifies the need to determine cost adjustments
considering that in the last 20-30 years, natural disasters are on the
rise as
a result. Asset management functions are to be adjusted to recalculate
potential increase in liabilities. Functions are basing changes as a
result of
the annual increase of 2-4% in notable household and property claims in
recent
years. The rise in claims to the industry
will have a trickling effect on investments and capital gains as
companies will
have to make allowances for increased liability/insurance policies. The
Because the insurance industry has chosen to be preemptive, a certain risk communication is necessary as it may already begin to increase rates with assumption of rise in claims. Since it has become a baseline assumption that natural disasters are on the rise, just how preemptive will the industry be? Afraid of being seen as only looking to capitalize on these events, they have also managed to identify adjustments that companies can make to allow for favorable reduction in premiums. When companies seek to reduce emissions or other factors that negatively contribute to climate change their insurance policy will reflect these changes. Just as insurance companies have been assessing the cost of climate change, research firms have been studying ways to reduce emissions and made recommendations for policy change. Although OPEC refuted the UK report in 2006 of the severity of climate change due to green house gas (GHG) emissions, British companies to include BP, are favorably pursing research for alternative fuels and other methods within their capacity to make positive changes. Governments and corporations alike may refute the need to take responsibility and act towards a positive change, the question also comes to bare the growing pains of change. There’s a concern of how companies will be able to maintain competitive posture yet respond to improvement. Although the cost benefit approach helps guide the business industry, support will be needed by research firms and government to help with a positive approach. Greed versus sustaining an environment is the struggle at which private industry will come to terms with once the profit margin is impacted. http://insurance.lawyers.com/Natural-Disaster-Insurance-Claims.html http://insurance.lbl.gov/MEDIA/RIMS_Climate.pdf http://www.env-econ.net/2006/10/british_climate.html
|