| The George Washington University
EMSE 232 Crisis and Emergency Management Newsletter |
| Volume #1 October 1st |
| Contents:
1) Introduction: Prof. George Haddow 2) Legislative Update: Stafford Act is “Mobilized” 3) Funding Programs: Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program 4) Hazard Update: Internet Hazard Prediction 5) Technology: GIS Resources for Emergency Managers page 4 column 2 6) RFP News: USA page 4 column 1 7) Upcoming events: Conferences page 4 column 1 |
The EMGT 232 Disaster
Newsletter is produced by the students in the Fall 2001 class EMGT 232:
Crisis and Emergency Management at The George Washington University in
Washington, DC. The student authors include Talal Alhazmi, Kathryn A. Allen,
James A. Cooke, Damon P. Coppola, Elizabeth N. Halford, Robert D. Hulshouser,
Nadeem U. Khan, Mariette M. Larrick, Stephen Marquette, Michele R. Novack,
George Nunez, John C. Peyrebrune, Jeannette C. Rood, Christian M. Salmon,
Monica M. Severson, and Carmen A. Whitson.
The purpose of The EMGT 232 Disaster Newsletter is to provide its readers with a current perspective of activities in the disaster management field in the United States and around the world. The Newsletter includes information on current disaster management trends in the areas of research, funding, technology, legislation and consulting. This information is provided in brief summaries of current activities accompanied by a computer link or reference to more detailed information. |
|
Stafford Act is “Mobilized" In the immediate wake of the terrorist events of 11 September 2001, President Bush articulated major disaster declarations for the states of New York, Virginia and New Jersey, which have been subsequently published as “Federal Register Notices.” A summary of the President’s declarations, with amendments, is provided herewith. New York (FEMA-1391-DR). In a letter dated 11 September 2001, the President declared a major disaster pursuant to his authority as provided for in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93-288. Federal funds for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation were limited to 75 percent of the total “eligible” costs. The President appointed Theodore A. Monette of FEMA as the “Federal Coordinating Officer” for the declared disaster. This declaration identified the Bronx, Kings, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, and Richmond Counties for individual and public assistance. Furthermore, all counties in the State were declared eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. In a September 18 amendment to this declaration, the President directed that FEMA be authorized to reimburse 100 percent of total “eligible costs” for public assistance. Virginia (FEMA-3168-EM). In accordance with the provisions of the Stafford Act, the President declared that a state of emergency existed in Arlington County that made it eligible for Federal emergency assistance. Thomas Davies of FEMA was appointed to act as Federal Coordinating Officer for the emergency. New Jersey (FEMA-3169-EM). At the request of the Acting Governor, the President declared that an emergency existed for the State pursuant to Section 501 (a) of the Stafford Act. The President recognized the extraordinary demand placed upon New Jersey for emergency and response services to NYC resulting from the disaster. Peter Martinasco was appointed as Federal Coordinating Officer for the emergency. All 21 counties in the State were declared to be adversely affected by the emergency. Sources: (1) Federal Emergency Management Agency, “Virtual Library and Reading Room”, 9/23/01; (2) Federal Emergency Management Agency, “Congressional and Intergovernmental Advisory # 20”. 9/19/01; (3) Federal Emergency Management Agency, “Disasters: Information on Federally Declared Disasters”, updates for 9/19/01 through 9/21/01; and (4) The White House, Office of Management and Budget, virtual news releases, 9/21/01. 107th Congress – Bill Summaries · H.R. 783.
· H.R. 748.
· H.R. 2762.
· H.R. 2333.
· H.R. 2176.
· H.R. 1760.
RFP News:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will issue an RFP on October 2, 2001 for construction of structures and facilities under the Duck Creek Phase I, Ohio Flood Damage Reduction Project. Bids are due by November 1, 2001. For further information visit the Commerce Business Daily web site (cbdnet.access.gpo.gov.) The National Science Foundation is accepting grant proposals for Ecosystem Studies. The program supports research that, in part, investigates landscape dynamics with an emphasis on quantitative models of disturbances, ecosystem resilience, and successional patterns. The target submission date is December 15, 2001. For further information visit the grant proposal section of the NSF web site (http://www.nsf.gov/home/deadline/deadline.htm). International The Republic of Argentina has received a loan of $300M from the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) to help finance a program to rehabilitate areas affected by the floods of 1998. Bids are due by October 26, 2001. The Government of Grenada has received a loan of $5.06M from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and a credit of $5.01M from the International Development Association (IDA) for the Emergency Recovery and Disaster Management Project and intends to use part of the proceeds for road rehabilitation, sea defenses work, and emergency communication and meteorological equipment. Bids are due by October 31, 2001. The Government of India has received a loan from the Asian Development
Bank (ADB) toward the cost of the Gujarat Earthquake Rehabilitation and
Reconstruction Project. The Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) invites
sealed bids for the procurement of conductors and insulators. The
Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB) invites sealed bids for
the procurement of iron and steel pipes. Bids are due by November
15, 2001.
GIS Resources for Emergency Managers by Monica Severson: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has proven effective in all four phases of the disaster management cycle: preparation, mitigation, response, and recovery because of its ability to capture, store, retrieve, manipulate, analyze, and display geographic information. In 1999, real-time GIS aided in the largest peacetime evacuation of 700,000 people along South Carolina’s coast in U.S. history when the threat of Hurricane Floyd. Prompted by the damage of Hurricane Hugo in 1989, the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) had developed a Hurricane Evacuation Decision Support Solution by using web-based maps that incorporated live information from SCDOT’s GIS. It was designed to put rapidly changing traffic and weather information at the fingertips of state officials who are tasked with managing evacuations. Specific Resources: FEMA - Emergency Managers may find the Mapping and Analysis Center (MAC) at FEMA helpful since they may receive remote sensing data that indicates areas affected by the disaster, as derived from various imagery products. Typical examples include flooded, saturated, and/or damaged areas. ESRI Press - They recently released a book talking about a dozen different ways in which GIS software is being used to save lives and protect property before, during, and after a disaster or emergency. The title is “Disaster Response: GIS for Public Safety.” This book contains information of how GIS is used for wildfire operations, managing emergency management system response, earthquake damage assessment, analyzing fire response performance, and other public safety applications. The National Association of Counties (NaCo) and ESRI, Inc. has recently
launched a Technology Foundation Grant Series to provide GIS software,
training, support and data to qualified NaCo members seeking to initiate
and expand their technology infrastructure. NaCo will award 200 introductory
grants and 100 intermediate grant packages. The grant period began
April 30, 2001 and ends April 1, 2002. NaCo and ESRI will issue a
“Best Practice Guide” that records the methods and procedures used by the
grant recipients to help form a peer exchange network.
Uses that Emergency Managers have found for GIS software:
References and Resources:
|
Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program by Carmen Whitson On January 10, 2001, James Lee Witt, the previous Director of FEMA, met with representatives of the nation’s major fire service organizations to announce the implementation of a $100 million Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. From January 23-25, representatives from the major fire service organizations met with FEMA officials and the United States Fire Administration (USFA) to help put together the criteria for evaluating the grant proposals. Between April 2 and May 2 more than 19,700 applications for grants were accepted from fire departments all over the country. The grant program was divided into six categories: training, wellness/fitness programs, vehicles, firefighting equipment, personal protective equipment, and fire prevention programs. Each fire department was allowed to apply for grants in a maximum of two different categories. In May and June three peer review panels were convened that were made up of more than 200 fire service personnel. These panels met at the National Emergency Training Center in Emmitsburg, MD, to review the applications and make recommendations. The recommendations were then forwarded to FEMA/USFA for review and final selection. A list of the most recent grants that were made in September can be found at: http://www.usfa.fema.gov/grants/. Information on all of the awards that have been made in this program, starting in July, is available from: http://www.usfa.fema.gov/about/press/. All of the grants for this program had to be awarded by September 30, 2001. On March 20th, Joe Allbaugh, Director of FEMA, announced that the FEMA FY2002 budget request included $100M to continue the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. He stated: “As our nation’s first responders to disasters, the fire service community deserves FEMA’s support and the continuation of this vital program acknowledges their important role.”
Hazard Update:
The Internet provides a wealth of information to those seeking hazard
prediction and research into the methods of forecasting these events.
Though the technology itself has not improved as a result of this new data
tool, the transfer of knowledge has become far easier and as result, more
widespread and useful. Timeliness is vital in issues pertaining to
forecasts and warnings, and nothing is faster than the instant access of
information on the web.
· The Northwest region should expect continued low water supplies
through spring 2002. The Northeast should expect dryness to persist
from October until December. Droughts should persist in western Texas
and southeastern New Mexico.
The National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) posts a website that displays
maps which highlight predictions for above or below normal wild fire potential
(www.nifc.gov). This season, they report increased danger throughout
the west coast and in upper New England (see below page 4)
National Interagency Fire Center “Fire Potential Assessment” (NIFC 2001)
For those seeking forecasts pertaining to the oceans, such as high seas warnings and predictions, the Marine Prediction Center (MPC) offers numerous options. Searching will provide information relating to marine currents, fog, as well as most of the storm data identified above. The Weather Channel Online (www.weather.com) provides arguably the most comprehensive choice of satellite images, photos, video clips, interactive maps, as well as up to the minute short and long term predictions throughout the world. For instance, their hurricane predictions have been recently upgraded to reflect an above average season with 6-8 hurricanes anticipated. Many weather centers, including NOAA and The Weather Channel, utilize
the expertise of renowned storm predictor William Grey of the University
of Colorado. His team’s long-range meteorological predictions are
takes as gospel. His website can be visited directly at typhoon.atmos.colostate.edu/forecasts.
Upcoming Conferences: "Environmental management and the mitigation of natural disasters: a
gender perspective" - Expert Group Meeting sponsored by the Division for
the Advancement of Women, Department for Economic and Social Affairs (DESA)
of the Secretariat for the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
(ISDR), United Nations, Ankara, Turkey, 6 - 9 November 2001. The objectives
of the meeting will be to assess the link between environmental management
and natural disasters from a gender perspective with a focus on the specific
phases of natural disaster mitigation. Contact: Ms. Dorota Gierycz, Chief,
Gender Analysis Section, Division for the Advancement of Women, Department
of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, DC2-1244, New York, NY
10017 U.S.A., Tel: (212) 963-5913, Fax: (212) 963-3463, E-mail:
“The Business of Earthquakes – What we learned from the Nisqually Earthquake.” Sponsored by the Cascadia Regional Earthquake Workgroup (CREW), FEMA and the USGS, November 27-28, 2001 in Seattle Washington and will feature presentations by representatives from the business community, engineering, physical and social scientists, elected officials and government agencies discussing the impacts of the Nisqually Earthquake. For additional information and registration visit www.crew.org. Contact: Bob Freitag at bfreitag@mindspring.com. The Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup (CREW) is a coalition of private and public representatives working together to improve the ability of Cascadia Region communities to reduce the effects of earthquake events
|