Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management

Crisis and Emergency Management

Newsletter Website
return to mainpage

 

 

 

April 2004                                                                            Volume 6 - Number 3

 

 

 Related Sites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hurricane Predictions...

 

 


Dr. Gray’s Hurricane Forecasts

 by Bev Burton

 

If hurricanes and devastation cannot be averted, why make predictions? 

                 

Accurate hurricane warnings, if heeded, save lives.  Reliable long-term predictions enable residents to take protective measures wrt their residential and business possessions and properties.  Dr. William (Bill) Gray, has been at Colorado State University (CSU) 43 years, in meteorology 50 years.  He extrapolates past environmental conditions into future predictions.  He leads CSU’s Tropical Meteorology Project and focuses on global impacts.  His hurricane predictions originated in 1984; only in last 20 years was there sufficient global data.  http://www.collegian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/12/09/3fd55cfb6a1ec

 

Namias and Ballenzweig provided the first significant hurricane predictions in the 1950s.  They compared mean atmospheric flow fields in the Atlantic Basin.  Dr. Gray inverted their method, and used hurricane activity as the dependent variable, linking the number of hurricanes to known tropical phenomena, e.g., Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO), El Nino, Caribbean sea-level pressure anomalies (SLPA) and West African rainfall.  Predictions are based on linear regression analysis, and give forecasts for nine separate categories of hurricane activity:        

Named Storms (NS)

Named Storm Days (NSD)

Hurricanes (H)

            Hurricane Days (HD)   

Intense Hurricanes (categories 3-5 account for 80-85% hurricane damage in US) (IH)

Intense Hurricane Days (IHD)            

Hurricane Destruction Potential (HDP)

Potential Destruction (MPD)

Net Tropical Cyclone Activity (NTC)

http://www.bbsr.edu/rpi/meetpart/092195summary/JE092195summary.html

http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts/index.php

 

His forecasts range 15 – 40 pages, with a synopsis and a summary of statistical probabilities, before it delves into the technical details (detailed methodology).  NOAA annual hurricane season predictions report them as “average,” “above” or “below average,” with only a brief description and cite no methodology.  Consequently media rarely utilizes Nona’s predictions in their public broadcasts. 

 

Dr. Gray’s hurricane prediction is a series of reports starting in December prior to the next calendar year’s hurricane season, with updates in April, June and August. 

Forecast report contains:

1.  Overall Prediction – represents what is reported to the public (includes statistical, analog, and qualitative adjustments)

2.  Statistical Method – combines climate factors into a formula of predetermined coefficients to produce the nine forecast elements.  The factors fall into three main categories: Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, Africa, and El Nino-Southern Oscillation.                                                                    3.  Analog Method – Dr. Gray chooses six factors, which will pose the most influence over the upcoming hurricane season, then searches for past years with actual similar values.  These years are analog years.  Five analog years are chosen for comparison and the observed parameter values are averaged to produce a prediction for the upcoming season.

 

Qualitative Adjustments include additional factors: sea surface temperatures, trade winds, and the Atlantic Thermohaline cycle (single most important factor in determining the number of intense hurricanes in a season).  Atlantic Thermohaline cycle was not understood until the mid-90’s.  Dr. Gray connected Atlantic basin hurricane activity with this cycle, spearheading new research.

 

Long-term Hurricane Season Predictions

http://web.nwe.ufl.edu/~jdouglas/final15581.pdf

http://web.new.ufl.edu/~jdouglas/final1558proposal2.pdf

 

Dr. Gray predicts over the next 20 years “We’ll see hurricane damage like we’ve never seen before.”  He does not attribute this upward swing to global warming.  Rather, hurricane activity has its own natural, 20-40 year cyclical nature which has occurred for thousands of years.  NOAA, has stopped funding his research, as no longer needed or no longer ground breaking, all 13 of Dr. Gray’s grant requests since ‘91 were turned down (likely a backlash due to his criticism of NOAA’s global warming theories).

http://www.globalwarming.org/sciup/sci12-8-99.html

http://www.wildweather.com/mom/gray.htm

 

Predictions vs. Actual Table Attached (1984 – 2002):

 

 

 

Named Storms: 1950 to 1990 Mean = 9.3

Year

Early December
Forecast

Early April
Forecast

Early June
Forecast

Early August
Forecast

Observed

1984

---

---

10

10

12

1985

---

---

11

10

11

1986

---

---

8

7

6

1987

---

---

8

7

7

1988

---

---

11

11

12

1989

---

---

7

9

11

1990

---

---

11

11

14

1991

---

---

8

7

8

1992

8

---

8

8

6

1993

11

---

11

10

8

1994

10

---

9

7

7

1995

12

10

12

16

19

1996

8

11

10

11

13

1997

11

11

11

11

7

1998

9

10

10

10

14

1999

14

14

14

14

12

2000

11

11

12

11

14

2001

9

10

12

12

14

2002
(as of 10/7/02)

13

12

11

9

12


Hurricanes: 1950 to 1990 Mean = 5.8

Year

Early December
Forecast

Early April
Forecast

Early June
Forecast

Early August
Forecast

Observed

1984

---

---

7

7

5

1985

---

---

8

7

7

1986

---

---

4

4

4

1987

---

---

5

4

3

1988

---

---

7

7

5

1989

---

---

4

4

7

1990

---

---

7

6

8

1991

---

---

4

3

4

1992

4

---

4

4

4

1993

6

---

7

6

4

1994

6

---

5

4

3

1995

8

6

8

9

11

1996

5

7

6

7

9

1997

7

7

7

6

3

1998

5

6

6

6

10

1999

9

9

9

9

8

2000

7

7

8

7

8

2001

5

6

7

7

8

2002
(as of 10/7/02)

8

7

6

4

4


Intense (Major) Hurricanes: 1950 to 1990 Mean = 2.3

Year

Early December
Forecast

Early April
Forecast

Early June
Forecast

Early August
Forecast

Observed

1990

---

---

3

2

1

1991

---

---

1

0

2

1992

1

---

1

1

1

1993

3

---

2

2

1

1994

2

---

1

1

0

1995

3

2

3

3

5

1996

2

2

2

3

6

1997

3

3

3

2

1

1998

2

2

2

2

3

1999

4

4

4

4

5

2000

3

3

4

3

3

2001

2

2

3

3

4

2002
(as of 10/7/02)

4

3

2

1

2

 

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/F5.html